38 Comments on “NYS Senator Diane Savino speaks on the Marriage Equality bill”

  1. Normally I'm one of those macho guys who thinks the only acceptible time for a man to cry is at the last scene of "Rudy", but this speech made tears well up in my eyes. Thank you, Senator.

    The votes in New York and Maine have my boyfriend and I bumming about our state getting marriage equality any time soon, but we know it's a matter of time. All we want is a shot.

  2. She is very honest and amazingly crazily well put in the simple but most relevant words of all!

    Love her. I sent her the Christmas to thank her just because she is so fair.

  3. Wow. She pretty much summed everything up beautifully. We need more politicians like her, and we need more couples committed to one another like the ones she admitted.

  4. The TRUTH is, Jesus is a terrible moral philospher, God does not exist, and the only arguments against gay marriage are based upon the bigoted, fictional and archaic bible and other holy scriptures.

  5. diah4: Yes of course a biblical 'abomination'! So this is a moral imperative on your part to 'vote against' should they become political issues?

    Very well. A partial list of other biblical 'abominations' that you need to consider equally:

    Leviticus 7:18, 7:21, 11:10-19, 11:20, 11:23, 11:41, 11:42, 19:7, Isaiah 66:17, 1:13, Deuteronomy 7:25, 17:1, 18:10-12, 22:5, 23:18, 24:1-4, 27:15, Jeremiah 6:15, 8:12

  6. Hey everybody, i'm so glad to see the positive responses this video has received, i'm a gay man and i live in South Africa, one of the few countries where gay marriage is completely legal, i realize how hard this issue must be on many americans and I admire this woman for fighting the good fight, remember always that sixty years ago in your country, as in mine, somebody would have laughed if you said one day a black man will be president. Things will work out, if you persevere.

  7. Damn, what a lawmaker Diane Savino is. I only wish she was in the Idaho state senate. She made every point we'd like make, as gay Americans. It IS about equality, not 'redefining marriage'. If we can't marry, then divorce ought to be outlawed for married heterosexual couples. Period. I am really kind of surprised that this did not pass in New York. Of all places.

  8. these comments are amazing, insightful, and bold. many, many kudos to Senator Savino. and many thanks to her for framing the arguement NOT as an attack against churches, but pro civil rights.

  9. Wow, what a beautiful, intelligent, articulate lady. I haven't been moved by a speech like that from anyone in years. New York, you are lucky to have her.

  10. Marriage equality? Sounds Orwellian. All these labels obscure the reality and misrepresent the issue. The truth is forgotten. If we alter the definition of marriage we disrupt the fundamental building block of society – the family. If people of the same sex can call their relationship marriage on what principle can we then forbid threesomes, foursomes, or other even less savory relationships? It's not a matter of prejudice, it's a matter of protecting the traditional family.

Comments are closed.