Why did John Boehner sign up for a protracted legal fight over anti-gay laws without finding out first what it was going to cost the taxpayers? Hope is on th…
Related Posts
14 Comments on “Boehner’s Blank Check to Anti-Gay Lawyers: April 11, This Week in Prop 8”
Comments are closed.
@cherrydog9 How so? Was he not an esteemed judge for many years?
If only my reps. in DC would listen to me! Sadly, one of my reps. is Steve
King & he ignores me & sends me form letters telling me how opposed he is
to me (as a Gay man)! Though, why don’t we start a campaign calling
virulently anti-Gay politicians what they are: “Gay Bashers”, because
they’re using the law to BASH us & oppress us! Gods, I still can’t believe
that Gallagher was SO publicly insensitive to declare that “the sky didn’t
fall” when Marriage Equality was invalidated! WTF?!
@breakingthisdown because judges should distance themselves as much as much
as possible from the social/political process outside the judiciary, else
risk self-recusal, or at least accusations thereof. The anti-gay right
would have a field day with a video like that and stoke up more backlash.
Why make progress more difficult than it needs to be?
Love this show!
Matt Baume, you are my personal hero. Thank you, again and again.
It’s great that Boehner is so committed to what’s important. While he could
go off on petty things like the deficit or unemployment he’s instead
focusing on DOMA and defunding Planned Parenthoot and NPR.
Another Great video. I always learn a lot from your videos big fan here.
Good for all the Democrats for putting preasure on the Republicans. I hope
the federal government will get ride of DOMA. Good for Delaware I hope RI
gets together behind Marriage Equality…I thought we skipped 2010 so that
we could all work together in 2012. WTF
Keep up the good work!
An “It gets better” vid from judge walker is a terrible idea. Obvious.
awsome vid! thnk u
My Rep and Senator are both supportive in RI 🙂
Matt Baume is either clueless or uninterested about his own reports. Just
last January, he reported that he called EQCA and they told him that a
return to the ballot was not even on their radar. Is the sudden change just
a cynical effort to raise money, or did EQCA simply show incompetence by
failing to even think about the issue until 18 months b4 election day?
Maybe Baume will pick up the phone and try to find out. But I doubt it.
LOL, so they worry about bias w/cases involving homosexuals and a possibly
gay judge, but they sure as hell don’t complain when it’s involving the
opposite.
will do