On Fox O’Reilly, Democratic Strategist Bernard Whitman Clashes with Senior Pastor Robert Jeffress over The US Supreme Court has overturned a law which denied…
Related Posts
30 Comments on “HEATED Gay Right Battle, Pastor Vs. Democratic Strategist: May GOD Not Be with You”
Comments are closed.
so these religious fuckers talk to god? they have met this thing called
god? so they have the inside scoop on everything? If they would just shut
the fuck up about fictitious gods and their so called morals, there is no
god!!!!!!! prove it or shut your fucking pie holes!
why can’t people recognize hatred and bigotry when it stares them right in
the face?
This pastor claims the definition of marriage has been recognized as one
man and one woman since the 1800s but what abt before that? The fact is the
definition of marriage gets changed over centuries. It used to be between
one man and many women. Marriage gets redefined in stages and it is
happening again as it should be. Christians did not create marriage and
they will never own it. Evolution in any form cannot and will not be
stopped.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/samesex-parents-more-caring-research-shows/story-fni6uo1m-1226809030429funny how the pastor tries to provide socio economic reasons but in the end
goes right back to god.
WHY CANT PEOPLE ACTUALLY WATCH THIS VIDEO?!!??!
I dont agree wit the pasteur but he is trying his best to give out a socio
economic reason and staying away from the typical Bible thumping. But its
SOOOOO EASSYYY to rip on him thinking ‘OH CHRISTIAN CLOSE MINDED PERSON’
Just cause someone doesnt believe in gay rights doesnt mean that person is
close minded. When did the idea of marriage was given to as a ‘Right’ and
not a previlage ? When did the liberal media claim the government had the
shots of calling ‘thats a marriage and that isnt a marriage’ when in fact
shouldnt it be the people’s decision?
I know its cool to support gay marriage as a young liberal but its an issue
that isn’t black and white and there are arguements on both sides worth
listening to
Gays have been around eversince man and before even in the animal kingdom.
Times change over the span of decades, centuries and millennial additions
to our line as a species, if they don’t wish to allow this, why not keep
slavery. Or why not execute non believers and crucify those that go against
religions that the majority follow? Why not kill women that are non
virgins? Or invade countries and create mass Genocides for the soul reason
of our “Higher Power” Commanding us to do? Times change and we change.
Why is a Baptist preacher being asked about politics and political
strategy?
“If we have the right to love and marry whom ever we want to, why don’t we
expand the definition of marriage further to include polygamous, to include
siblings, to include 15 year olds.”
Well, first of all, I’m glad you didn’t use the ‘bestiality’ approach, at
least you’re smart enough not to do that.
Also, Mr. Whitman, the Australian study Pastor Jeffress brought up about
children thriving in homosexual families is in fact true, there are many
resources on just the first couple pages of google that prove this
accurate, so just because you don’t believe in something doesn’t mean it’s
not true.
“Let me just end this, what we’re concerned about, is that in this
conversation, that we’re respectful that both sides can be heard without
people believing in traditional marriage being branded as intolerant or
anti-gay, I don’t like that, okay. I don’t like that when people are
branded one way or the other, there better be a respectful conversation
here.”
Okay Laura, let me just give you a couple definitions here. Intolerance,
the unwillingness to accept views, beliefs, or behavior that differs from
one’s own. Anti-gay, someone who is opposed to or hostile to homosexuals or
to homosexual social reforms and institutions. Based on this video alone, I
can clearly see that you and Whitman are both intolerant and anti-gay. And
oh no, you’re being branded as a homophobic jerk, which is TRUE, meanwhile
you two are talking about how homosexuals can’t be good parents, and are
dangers to society and to children, a topic that Jeffress brought up and
PROVED WASN’T TRUE.
Yes to gay rights, and fuck you to fundamental religious, brainwashed
twats!
Perhaps the preacher should be a little more honest and admit that he
actually hates Gay people!
Bernard Whitman is a complete moron. I’m tired of seeing this idiot on Fox
News.
LMFAO. So two men marrying men demeans women? Is he saying that women
should only be caretakers? Wouldn’t that sort of demean women?
I can’t stand Jeffress’ face. I want to punch him.
why would anyone want to put their penis in someones butt hole? the linning
in the butt holes gets distorted and bacteria accumulates, which will lead
to surgery, and eventuallty diapers. why?
Wonder if anyone would have the audacity to go upto the Dalai Lama , for
example, and tell him to his face that his faith was “incorrect”. Just
wondering..
Jeff, maybe I didn’t express it well. But I am totally serious. I did read
these things about gays being less accepted in countries where men are
“less masculine.” I don’t honestly remember the books, but it was in a
university library by reputable ethnologists. And they went on to describe
European and especially Western European and Asian cultures as particular
vehement against gays, whereas Middle Eastern (pre-Islamic), Australasian,
Polynesian it was no big deal.
People who don’t support gay marriage are bigots. There is no beating
around the bush.
my personal belief will not change about gay people and if it is a desease
than you should not accept it and should treat it not let them rule the
world just bwcause of a status for one you can only be born 2 thins not 4
either u arw born a man or a woman and you reason on earth is to reproduce
and a man with a man or woman with a woman cannot do such now its ur life i
cannot tell you what to do with it but don’t breack my religius believe
coming to the church and trying to force them
I do see Lesbians as sick and disgusting. Lesbians being 2 females…and I
see them as “2 females”. It’s when they are so jacked up in the head and
have to resort to having sex with each other that it gets freaky. In your
mind and words, this makes me gay. Talk about an ignorant statement that
you made…this one is just lame. Try harder to look smarter.Read a book
when you’re getting plugged in the bottom. Just a thought that might
educate you more. READ “THE” BOOK and perhaps you’ll be saved.
In everyday usage a theory is an hypothesis but in the scientific world a
theory is a fact.
He was supposed to FULFILL the law, which is what He did. And if something
is fulfilled, why keep doing it?
The “types” of love IS modern love. Romantic love and for the sake of love
simply did not exist to a significant degree in the past (except as
described as foolhardy teenage trysts). Gay love is natural corollary of
modern love. That is loving someone because of who they are, not how much
money or prestige or continuing on the relgious tradition, or in the case
of gays, what body part you may happen to have. The church has thoroughly
espoused modern love…it should espouse gay love too.
Judaism is loaded with rites, rituals, and beliefs that point to the coming
of a Messiah. *Snort* The rise of so many different religions isn’t God’s
doing, but the actions of men. Some say “Lo here” and others say “Lo
there!”. The Jews rejected Christ as their Messiah even though their entire
religion was supposed to prepare them to accept Him when He came. The
Islamists rejected Christ as the Messiah and mixed pagan traditions into
their beliefs. The Catholics rejected Jewish philosophy.
Hey you never know there could have been a typo in the bible hahaha. The
bible also states most things as sin including eating shellfish and wearing
mixed cloth which I would say they majority of the world does.
Yes, wanting to be able to visit my sick partner in the hospital, make
decisions on his behalf when he is incapacitated, have him be able to apply
for citizenship in my country, and have us share workplace benefits and
social security benefits like all married heterosexual couples is just so
goddamn selfish of us. What are we thinking? Hint, dude: I don’t think it’s
LGBT people that are being selfish here. You just don’t want to share your
toys. Also, how are we disrupting social stability?
Hopefully Australia will be another one of those countries soon enough.
It’s a scientific FACT there are NO legit socialogical reasons to be
against gay marriage & gays raising kids, period (many studies have been
done)! That’s what desperate haters say to demonize gay marriage & link it
to other situations who DO have socialogical issues with reguard to
marriage. fear & hate baiting is all these haters have. Younger gens have
seen them for who they are, will sidestep their BS in favor of a better
more loving country!
If you are going on evidence, the bible is a much more flimsy theory than
evolution. Electronics and the theory of combusion are also theories, but
they work well enough to allow us to use computers, drive cars, and ride on
airplanes. Medicine is also a theory. Most people would rather depend if
they got leprosy and go to a local hosptial for antibiotics, then depend on
the bible, which means they get “cast out.”
Another reason the US is a beautiful place to live. Even with the political
war and unemployment we may not be the best country in the world but North
America is still one of the best places to live. The 1st Amendment also
allows me to quote the bible, so I’m going to quote it.
AHHHH where do I begin? “the rise of OTHER religions isn’t God’s doing but
the actions of men” Love it!! HARDY HAR HAR! Umm, in today’s world, you DO
know where those who claim to be gifted with personal visitations and
prophecies of the supernatural kind land up don’t you? In prison or the
funny farm.. A few lines into your rant and you seem to be a freakin’ mess
yourself. Stop landing up in my inbox. You’re wasting your time chum. Go
see a doctor.