28 Comments on “Republican Rep Calls Global Warming a ‘Total Fraud’”

  1. According to Forbes Magazine 30,000 Climate Scientists say Global Warming
    doesn’t exist. Get the real facts before you slander people. Don’t put
    videos up when you have no data to back what you are saying, you are
    wasting our time. A reporter only has his credibility and when it is gone
    it is gone. Choose your battles carefully or you soon will have no
    audience.

  2. they should start arresting people in suits and ties so that they, in those
    suits and ties are labeled in the way that people see someone in sagging
    pants , so that they are prejudged as criminals and wont be trusted as
    their word alone. imagine if some crazy tattooed gangster was shouting out
    global warming is fake the people would not believe him, ironically the
    gangsters still have more sense than that.

  3. Of course! ALL 97% of the scientists IN THE WORLD who say it’s REAL got
    together and conspired the WHOLE issue. -_-

  4. Sure the majority of the scientific community agrees on this. But yeah,
    Dana’s got the scoop.

  5. Hey did anyone else notice how the michael hastings story they published
    last night isnt there anymore? thumbs up so so TYT can adress this please

  6. Consensus *IS* how science is done, it is the heart of peer review. It’s
    the consensus of respected experts in their field, or did you imagine that
    physics is just “something some guys made up”? The “prominent scientists”
    you cite aren’t. They’re extreme out-liers in their field, held to be
    disreputable or heading that way, or else they have no respected climate
    science credentials.

  7. Who is doing the lying? The earth has not warmed so far in this century and
    arctic sea ice (arctic and Antarctic combined) is above average if not at
    record levels. Those are facts, not models. Don’t drink the Kool-Aid.

  8. Glaciers melting is a negative thing actually, if the north pole disappears
    then the golf stream will not go like it should and the climate all over
    the northern hemisphere is gonna be completely fucked.

  9. Exept the temperature following CO2 levels, the fact that the global
    average temperature has risen more in 200 than in 5 million years, and
    continues to do so, acceleratingly, etc. CO2 traps heat. Add more CO2 to
    the air, more heat is trapped. How hard is that to grasp?

  10. those skeptics make up less than 3% of the scientific community (who do
    understand the science cos, you know, they’re scientists.) the claim you
    are making is factually incorrect. America is the only OECD nation on the
    planet which is still going through this debate. It is happening, do some
    basic googling on Venice or the Maldives. You have been lied to.

  11. You have to be crazy to think that human emissions dont affect the weather,
    you have to be a special kind of crazy to think taxation will solve it.

  12. I’m with James Hanson, put this pog ignorant, right wing cunt on trial for
    crimes against humanity. And its the geological record that is the evidence
    – there is NO body of evidence that shows that this IN ANY WAY is a hoax –
    sack that bastard.

  13. Well, since the Boston bombing, I started to listen to him, but then I
    realized how clueless he really is. I just can’t support someone who won’t
    speculate on facts instead of assumptions.

  14. People cite the scientific consensus on global warming to support their
    belief not only in global warming but that it’s man-made. Consensus,
    however, isn’t science. Most of these people don’t understand the science
    but merely cite the Consensus, perhaps thinking take its side makes them
    smart. Many prominent scientists, however, are among the skeptics of this
    Consensus, like Khabibullo Abdusamatov, Judith Curry, Craig & Sherwood
    Idso, Richard Lindzen, Garth Paltridge.

  15. Well, the fact is, Global warming is happening. Call it whatever you want,
    the glaciers are melting right now.

  16. A term used by educated and honest people. (non-republicans)
    “CONS”…..describes reublicans.

  17. There is a way to ascertain long term climate information. Ice core
    samples, taken from Antarctica, contain atmospheric data stretching back
    thousands of years. So the argument that their is not enough long term
    information about climatic change is invalid.

  18. Biased sampling will give you biased results. Not everyone is
    scientifically minded. That’s why the effort has to go to education in
    young people first.

  19. I’m hoping now that many more people have access to information that most
    of these ass hats will be voted out. They’ve been able to take advantage of
    the peoples ignorance for WAY too long now and it’s time to correct the
    corruption.

  20. Yeah, all these scientists do all day is create revolutionary advances in
    medicine and heighten our standard of living tremendously. Their just a
    waste of tax payer money.

  21. Just Google this guy. Not surprising this guy would say this, and we all
    know he doesn’t really mean it. This guy’s a Reagan loyalist who rarely if
    ever votes outside his party line. This guy isn’t a politician, he’s a
    statistic on a lobbyist’s spreadsheet.

Comments are closed.