http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/gainor-marriage-equality-advocates-will-undermine-our-entire-country-and-everything-made-us- MRC spox Dan Gainor claims…
40 Comments on “Gainor: Gay Rights Advocates ‘Undermine Our Entire Country’ & What ‘Made Us Free’”
Comments are closed.
I’m ok with polyarmory.
The left wants tolerance damn those accepting bastards!
raping little boys is the territory of christians…. ask your faggot
“pope” and priests….
Traditional marriage advocates: They know the words but not what they mean.
Call the WHAAAAAAAMBULANCE! Silly Christians!
yes, if “discrimination” now means “not being able to deny others civil
rights” nothing more ignorant than when a loud bully bitches about their
rights to bully
Then there are musilm ruled countries where any man can have four wives.
‘A no holds barred morality’ will apparently undermine what made America
great. Wasn’t it that ‘no holds barred morality’ that got slavery ended,
women the right to vote and the end of segregation, all in the face of
right wing Christofascists? Yeah, I think ‘no holds barred morality’, the
one that tends towards fairness and equality for all people, is the one to
stick with.
samson had 700 wives and over 1000 concubines….. just saying
If you have to resort to the slippery slope argument in order to make your
case, you’ve already lost the argument.
This is not a question of who you have sex with or how many. It is about
taxation, inheritance, property rights etc.
the problem with polygamy is that it creates uncertainty with regards to
spousal rights and generally plays havoc with inheritance. otherwise to
each their own,
Wingnuts complain they are losing their freedom when they are no longer
allowed to stomp down on others.
Hey Gainor — I’m on the left; you know what *I* think is morally wrong?
When people try to force their religious views on others.
Hey! It’s the guy that believes he’s a doctor! Welcome back. I see you have
some more nonsense to spew.
Heh, heh. I can see you’re tempted already! Actually, I feel sorry for you.
If you really feel sexually attracted to men, there’s nothing wrong with
that. You’ve just been brainwashed to think otherwise. Seriously, don’t
worry about it. But for the rest of us, legalizing gay marriage isn’t going
to cause us to change who we find attractive. (Although, with 7 billion
people already on the planet, it might be helpful if it did!)
Aren’t you really talking about catholic priests, were you raped by a
priest as a little boy? Is that why you hate so much.
boo hoo
That jivin’ honky is trippin’ some balls.
Project much?
Straight vagina sex with little girls is the goal of straights! Always has
been. What straight wants to fuck a 45+ year old bitch, when he can rape a
little girl? Here is a tip, friend. Open another tab, type in xxnx.com,
search for gay porn, be comfortable with who you are. Also, you seem to
have a strange fascination with small boy’s bums. Please stay away from
children.
Religious traditions do not come before human rights!
More of the “Cats and dogs, living together!” hysteria. *yawn*
There’s a *tradition* of polygamy (for rich men) in the Bible. So there’s
that for this “traditional marriage.”
Polygamy can become prevalent, Consider Utah, prior to the 1870s.
Good.
does this guy realize he is parroting the 1960’s anti-miscegenation groups?
bigotry never changes it just uses different words, it seems.
fuck dan, fuck the right, & FUCK RELIGION!
These rightards are really, really butthurt about the idea of gays they
have never met, aren’t they?
And the long, blood-gurgling death rattle of religion continues.
You fascination with rape and young boys, what’s on your hard drive?
polyamory*
hey, this isn’t about me. this is about you and your unrequited man-love.
….April Fools? Please?
You do know that there’s a difference between homosexuality and pedophilia,
right?
Logic isn’t your strong point, is it.
I swear Christians have the biggest silliest persecution complex on earth.
im sure you’d know from experience.
2/10 I like the subtle wordage though.
The only problem with that is one of practicality. Divorces involving only
two people are already enough of a clusterfuck. Get three or four people
involved and you have a recipe for even more fun. That said, Divorce
Court’s ratings would probably get quite a bump.