23 Comments on “Lawrence O’Donnell On Rush Limbaugh-Bill O’Reilly’s Gay Marriage Feud: ‘They Hate Each Other’”

  1. When I see Rush defend traditional marriage, I have to think “It’s the
    lord’s holy word as his 2nd wife said to his 3rd.”

  2. I CANT WAIT TILL THE PIG OD’S ON OXYS. AND CROSS EYED BILLO IS LOSING
    VEIWERS FASTER THAN HIS HAIR. ITS ALL GOOD. ONLY A MATTER OF TIME FOR FOX
    NEWS AND THE JUNKIE TO GO DOWN THE TUBES. AMERICANS ARE SICK OF THE LIES
    !!!!!

  3. then youtube search for the entire clip.then youtube search for an entire
    clip of his stance one year ago…..then compare..he is CLEARLY flipping
    flopping…. that being said…if more people werent such hardcore
    ideologues and extremist who wont even entertain the notion of being wrong
    then this country( and congress) would be in much better shape…

  4. Um… who the fuck is asking you to be gay? Is that what you really think
    the issue is about? And you someone manage to put the gun debate into your
    ramblings? Reading your post, I’d be nervous with you owning a fucking
    houseplant, let alone a gun. Or a kitchen knife or a piece of bark for that
    matter. This country was not based on Christianity, the founding fathers
    gave us freedom of religion. Also, wanna know how many mistresses the
    founding fathers had? Not very Christian, is it? You psycho.

  5. I don’t think his personal opinion has necessarily changed on whether gay
    people should marry…….he only acknowledged those supporting gay
    marriage have a better argument than those speaking against it when it
    comes to the law. Which is true. But I wouldn’t exactly consider it a
    “flip-flop” on the issue…he doesn’t seem pro gay marriage.

  6. “It’s just awful when people change their minds. Except when Bill O’Reilly
    does it.” In 2005 and 2009, Bill O’Reilly was saying that gay marriage will
    lead to poly-marriage and bestiality marriage. In 2013, Bill O’Reilly says
    that if you want to stand against gay marriage, you have to do more than
    say “The Bible says gay marriage is wrong, so therefore it’s wrong.” I
    don’t see this as him changing his mind – unless he in 2013 now comes out
    and says “gay marriage won’t lead to poly-marriage”.

  7. He said its a compelling argument. He did not say the gays are right. He
    just wishes somebody would come up with a better argument than “god said
    so”.

  8. if these stupid socialist marxist facist liberals force me to have a gay
    marriage im gonna be PIST!why do these socialist want to force their
    lifestyle on me. im not going to be gay no matter what.. after the marixst
    kenyan muslim president barack HUSSIEN obama confiscates all of our guns
    like hitler did he is going to force us to have a gay marriage! why does
    barack HUSSIEN obama hate jesus?we should be able to force our religous
    beliefs on everyone bcos this country was founded on christianity

  9. O’Reilly is actually admitting that the general social situation in America
    makes the general opposition to same-sex marriage non-sensical. Most
    notably, the younger generations are much more relaxed than the older
    generation on this issue. O’Reilly may not be the symbol of brilliance
    galore, but he is neither stupid nor blind in his analysis. Actually, he is
    the only decent journalist on FNC. And bear in mind he worked for E! for a
    time…

  10. continued…… my issue isnt with oreilly flip flopping,thats very
    commendable and i urge more people ( on the left and the right) to consider
    the same thing. If your not open to your position being wrong then YOU are
    the problem. my issue w/him is the hypocricy os slamming other people who
    flipflop

  11. Yes yes…fight amongst yourselfs…feel free to use the knives,here are
    some I’ve sharpened especially

  12. Regardless of where you stand on the issue, O’Donnell is taking O’Reilly
    out of context – as did Rush as well. O’Reilly is stating the perspective
    of reality. He was speaking of the current consensus. O’Reilly is
    essentially correct in stating that “bible-thumpers” are not compelling the
    courts. I wish he would have elaborated more to this point, but I don’t
    believe – based on the limited clips – provided here that O’Reilly is
    clearly ‘flipping’ his belief.

Comments are closed.