On this episode of Skeptically Speaking, I interview Angelique Reid who addresses the perceived “Gay Agenda” in Jamaica We had a good discussion touching on …
Related Posts
38 Comments on “Skeptically Speaking – “The Gay Agenda in Jamaica””
Comments are closed.
Total madness!
Both brought up factual points however I have to agree with Clive. She
obviously needs a course in sociology.
Do you know, Clive Forrester, that Prof. Rex Nettleford was given the
highest award by the Jamaican government. He was a Rhodes Scholar and in
charge of a Department at the University. In the 70’s I knew many
homosexuals and I didn’t see anybody harming them. It is a proven fact that
most homosexuals are harmed by other gays, like a certain Ambassador. So
stop acting as if Jamaica is denying jobs etc to gays which is a lie. The
problem is when some gays take certain flamboyant behavior to the street
where some people are not educated. But if you are a gay person living in
Jamaica you can live your life, work, and be successful so stop telling
lies because you have an agenda where you want an openly gay society.
It seems that you, like Angelique, somehow missed the whole scientific
discussion on gender. You weren’t born with a gender – you were socialized
into it. Gender is a social construct, sex is a biological one, and
sexuality is a complex interplay of the two.
And a member of a Jamaican catholic apologetics council along with her
Church brother Peter Espeut or something to that effect right Angelique ?(
I haven’t gone through the entire video yet but did y’all cuss each other ?
Lol 🙂
This was a very informative program. I enjoy this one.
Finally, I would strongly urge Ms. Angeline to do some extensive research
on homosexuals/homosexuality from sources (outside of the church)
I started being attracted to the same-sex as young as 6 yrs old. Attraction
is NOT ALWAYS ABOUT FUCKING SEX!! And at 6, I wasn’t thinking about sexing
up this other 5/6 yr old girl.
I made reference to the Church once in the hour.
Rahtid Clive – yorker length delivery on the JFLAG video series!
No one is allowed to judge only! 🙂 God!
Oh my goodness!! Angelique has conceded that the buggery law should be
repealed!
Angelique, sexual orientation is not a “lifestyle”
it doesn’t matter what we say are how we feel about gays,our father in
heaven already say what is wrong and what is right,and who can enter into
his rest,let GOD be our judge,so far my research on his law say its
wrong,if every same sex should be together then it would be unfair for him
to say go and multiply
Male and Female are biological. Masculine and Feminine are cultural. She
needs to appreciate the difference between SEX and GENDER.
Ok and what the hell is she saying about ‘conceiving’ children they’re lots
of straight people can’t have kids so what, they shouldn’t get married. The
must adopt, what if they want to use science to conceive, no they can’t!??
So what about the single parents, and what about the men with all 5 and 10
children with all different women.
at 8 yrs of age i had no interest in male or female, that interest
developed fat later. i think her views are a bit narrow though
I would imagine that marriage is more than sex…? One doesn’t need to be
married to have sex and procreate yeah?
Still wrong
It pains me deeply that it’s people like this woman who hold a popular
consensus on who I am as an individual- the ignorance seeping from her
mouth is nauseating.
This woman is so extreme she’s just as bashful as any terroist. Her love
for slavery is deplurable. Please woman keep Canada out of your delusional
no relivant information. Talking so reckless comparing sexual behaviour
with homosexuals. As a professional health professional in Canada am going
to puke at this woman non intact knowledge. This woman obviously don’t seem
to have any insite of herself. She read this she read that but in the same
breath she disqualify research as worthy.
No, not at all Angelique, I think you did a good job of representing your
views. However, I do think that the underlying premises of your views are
simply wrong, or unduly reductionist. The matter of gender is more than
“language engineering”. If gender simply meant male or female, explain to
me then, why the Charter of Rights excludes any reference to “gender”,
referring only to “male” and “female”. In answering that question, you may
want to look at the report of the Joint Select Committee
No Angelique -modern law didn’t come from the church
Gender is male of female. This is about language engineering.
Gender and biological sex are not the same. Culture dictates that a person
with a particular sexual organ behaves in a particulare way. That is what
gender is.
Yes indeed Sankofa, and thanks alot for tuning in.
This arrogant, load lady refuses to listen to listen to reason and pay
attention to what Clive is saying. You welcome studies that confirm your
suspicions about homosexuals, but deny those which indicate what gender
really is, as opposed to sex! Studies from years gone back have noted that
gender is cultural, but in your ignorance you stick to your guns because
your whole argument would crumble. I applaud Clive for being able to sit
and listen to you
Sex is not = gender, woman!
my gender is female that is how my father in heaven make me,and thats how
he want me to be,so there shouldn’t be ant confusion on my part plus my GOD
dont make mistake,man does
To kidge is yo seal your own fate I’m a straight femal by birth but I do
not judge
Actually, celibacy for me is “unnatural”…
wow. Where are these people getting these sexual practices from?
Celibacy has the same net effect as same sex activity. It is as unnatural
as homosexuality. It is an agenda of the Catholic Church.
Christians need to stop pathologizing homosexuals as though we are some
depraved and deranged sub-human sect with sinister intentions.
Conversations such as this are important for education.
So did I see somebody post that they new about sex from they were 4? Let me
see if understand that, you knew you were same sex sexuality and had those
fantasies at age 4? Hmmm….who can argue with that? Whatever Ryan…..are
you happy in your faith? You sure don’t seem that way – you’re a very
conflicted man.
Marriage is already defined as a union between a man and a woman and base
on that definition Gay and lesbians cannot be married to each other. The
union between people of the same sex cannot be defined as marriage. Its
best they find another word and leave th heterosexuals with their
“marriage”
Sexuality and sexual behaviour are two different things. There is no
necessary relationship between gayness and anal sex. There are countless
gay people who don’t have anal sex!
Not always the position Clive. Research has been altered to support and
advance the agenda for the acceptance of same sexual practice.